Comments on: Managing through disagreement

By: Bridgett

Bridgett — Thu, 16 May 2013 16:05:57 +0000

Hi, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one
and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam feedback?
If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can advise?
I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any support is very much appreciated.

By: Jana

Jana — Thu, 09 May 2013 07:25:25 +0000

I must thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this site.

I’m hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts by you later on as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get my own, personal site now ;)

By: electricians newcastle

electricians newcastle — Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:39:23 +0000

I’m fairly certain We have check this out exact same kind of affirmation anywhere else, it ought to be gaining popularity with the masses

By: Ricker Silva

Ricker Silva — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:22:47 +0000

Coincidentally in the company i work for there is a tense environment. We are in a financial jeopardy so it is a desperate time that needs desperate decisions to make. Reading this, well I think you should go deeper in decision making and disagreements solving in a hostile environment like those created when you know that the delivery should be delivered or the next month no body will have to come back to the office.

By: Bhuvan thaker (@bhuvanthaker)

Bhuvan thaker (@bhuvanthaker) — Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:07:33 +0000

It is so perfect..this is the secret of understanding team dynamics. Pranam guruji ~

By: Dare Obasanjo

Dare Obasanjo — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:46:49 +0000

This response doesn’t make any sense. I’ve reread a couple of times over the course of a few days and I’ve given up. It completely fails at communicating a lucid point of view.

It’s one thing to agree or disagree with the conflict resolution techniques Steven posted in his blog. It’s another thing to throw out some half baked manifesto about technical advancements needing to be an environment where people argue with each other and then claim that it isn’t possible to work with Steven Sinofsky because he posted conflict resolution tips on his blog. Most logical people would point out that that is self-contradictory statement.

Hopefully, you’ll respond with a more coherent articulation of the point you’re trying to make. I myself have some questions about what Steven and would be interested in well articulated counter points.

By: DEV55

DEV55 — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:38:10 +0000

Somehow I can’t reply to your last comment in this loop. So doing it here…

Well anyway, I am actually confused with what you are trying to say here as well. I think you got something wrong with Steve. I just disagreed with your argument, unlike how you show disagreement with Steve(the person)! I hope this is not hard to understand..

By: Onuora

Onuora — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:07:54 +0000

Good point.

Agreed.

By: Dan

Dan — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:52:01 +0000

I totally agree, maybe this blog is not for me. In fact, it’s definitely not for me, if I don’t like it. But it doesn’t mean that what I said is wrong (especially since it only describes my opinion). I left the feedback, because the author explicitly invited feedback in one of earlier posts. Most people I know who write public blogs are looking to attract audience and foment discussion, all else being equal, so maybe Steven will find this feedback data point useful.

By: Onuora

Onuora — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:30:33 +0000

Dan,

With all due respect, a blog is a personal thing. It is an expression of an author’s personal or professional thoughts or feelings.

Saying a person should shorten or reformat those to make you feel better doesn’t really make sense to me. Maybe it just means that this isn’t a blog for you?